Exposing the Machinery of Deception and Israel’s Attack on Iran
Why are those who once opposed the Ayatollah regime now supporting Iran (not its government) against the Israeli attack backed by the US/NATO? From my articles and posts, it should be clear that I do not support the so-called European extreme right. I am even less supportive of the Ursula regime, particularly those who refuse to engage in open debate and use all the tricks of power to avoid dialogue. The left, once regarded as a cultural conveyor, has now become obscurantist. I remain hopeful that a viable alternative to the Euro-Atlantic lobby regime will arise, meeting a civil political demand that currently has no means of expression.
There is no longer a limit to disinformation. Mainstream media — suggested by the governing oligarchy — systematically attack alternative European and American parties with misinformation. Nonetheless, these parties are increasingly gaining popular support. This is not merely a political dispute; it is an ideological operation aimed at eradicating dissent and stifling meaningful debate. Democracy is deteriorating, and hope for progress is fading. We are witnessing the rise of true totalitarianism.
I refuse to label those opposing the establishment as “right-wing,” because that falsely implies all other political forces are left-wing or progressive. That’s not true. Are Ursula von der Leyen, Merz, and Macron really left-wing? Was Biden a leftist? Is Starmer a progressive socialist? Let’s not fool ourselves. The fundamental goal of this disinformation campaign is to delegitimize a growing popular movement that resists the most sinister conformism and the oligarchic regime’s primary aim: self-preservation.
The new populist movements challenging the status quo are labeled “far-right” to evoke Nazism and fascism, but they bear no relation to those ideologies. Let me clarify, I do not support Trump, Orban, or Le Pen. However, I am an honest observer: This regime creates external enemies as a survival strategy.
The public is bombarded with misused terms, twisted into insults when spoken in a degrading manner. People may opposesovereigntism, but it is a legitimate principle that does not threaten democracy. Far from it, if not the opposite. Supporting Russia instead of the U.S./NATO is a matter of perspective, not an assault on democracy, as the mainstream media portrays it. How many have shamefully supported Gaza’s genocide until yesterday, hiding behind trivial lexical objections? Some still do.
There is nothing “homophobic” about the programs of parties opposing the “Ursula formula” — the most typical “grand coalition” found in European parliaments. Those who wish to practice and express their homosexuality openly are free to do so in Russia. Yes, there are unfortunate limitations, but they cannot be classified as persecution or human rights violations. These issues should be addressed in Gaza, not here. How many people know that Alice Weidel (in the picture with her partner), the leader of the alleged homophobic Alternative für Deutschland, is openly lesbian?
The narrative mistakenly equates opposition to homosexual adoption and stricter abortion laws with Nazism and moral depravity. This is false. It would be more productive to examine these issues without bias — without linking them to Nazism — and to engage in honest debates. These are complex questions that warrant nuanced discussion.
The trick is to connect these relatively harmless policy disagreements with extremist accusations. Opposing the overreach of European institutions and favoring different approaches to citizenship and migration does not make someone a Nazi. It reflects a different worldview, not homophobia or anti-choice sentiments. So, who truly threatens freedom: those who hold differing opinions and are unfairly branded as Nazis, or those who manipulate the narrative to falsely portray others and confuse the issues?
